MEASURING EMPLOYEES’ PERFORMANCE
https://bussinessideas.namanmahajan.com/ |
MEASURINGEMPLOYEES’PERFORMANCE
Recent research suggests that the average company spends
40 percent of its revenues on people-related expenses (human
capital costs), and 92 percent of financial directors think human
capital has a “huge” impact on customer satisfaction and profitability.
However, only 16 percent of companies have any real idea of the
return on human capital investments. The solution is to measure
the direct return on your investments in people
The idea
Given the sums invested in human capital activities—notably
training and development—and the clear link between investment
in employees and effectiveness, the need for systems to measure
performance is vital. According to General Electric’s former CEO,
Jack Welch: “The three most important things you need to measure
in a business are customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction
and cash fl ow.” Although Welch later changed the last item to
shareholder value, the importance of the other two—and their
connection—remains strong.
Executives typically encounter one or more problems with
performance measurement.
• Too many measures obscure the most signifi cant issues and
divert attention from other issues.
• Measures are disconnected, unrelated to the fi rm’s strategy and
business priorities.
• Results are emphasized without necessarily providing an
adequate explanation of how they were achieved.
• Rewards are not in line with measures of performance;
consequently, the desired behaviors are not encouraged.
• Measurement is divisive, failing to support team-based working
and collaboration.
• Short-term-ism is encouraged, as measurement leads to an
intense focus on improving the next quarter’s results.
Watson and Wyatt’s Human Capital Index highlights the impact
of people management practices, with five issues directly affecting
profits:
https://bussinessideas.namanmahajan.com/ |
1. Total rewards and accountability.
2. Collegial, flexible working place.
3. Recruitment and retention.
4. Open and honest communications.
5. Focused HR service technologies.
One approach to measuring the link between investments in people
and performance is provided by B&Q’s “Employee Engagement
Program me.” This prioritizes employee engagement and customer
loyalty. Every manager has a regular, one-page report summarizing
their performance in two areas: managing human capital and
managing traditional finance measures.
As a result, employee turnover reduced from 35 percent to 28
percent (each percentage point of attrition costs at least £1 million),
and profi ts increased, with turnover per employee rising from£87,000 in 1998 to £106,000 in 2002. The role of the finance team
is central to the success of the process: designing, funding, and
managing the program. Other features of the program include close
liaison between HR and retail operations, objective measurements
directly focusing actions on enhancing performance, and staff
commitment to the program.
https://bussinessideas.namanmahajan.com/ |
In practice
• Recognize that including “people” measures in an overall
corporate scorecard raises the profile of human capital and
ensures management focus. There is a connection between
strong people practices, increased customer satisfaction, and
financial results.
• Choosing the right HR measures means finding the link between
motivating staff and achieving vital business outcomes—
including issues as diverse as product innovation, safety, and
customer satisfaction.
• Ensure top-level commitment to finding out and using this
information.
• Provide active support for front-line managers.
• Recognize the importance and impact of discretionary
behavior.
0 Response to "MEASURING EMPLOYEES’ PERFORMANCE"
Post a Comment